TerminalExecutionOdds337ToolsContact
    DocsLog in
    1. Home
    2. Guides
    3. Betting strategy that holds up: price, staking, testing and records
    4. Staking plans compared on the same 100 bets

    Staking plans compared on the same 100 bets

    Staking plans compared on 100 hypothetical bets: level stakes, a percentage of the bank, staking to win a set amount and Kelly, and why none fixes a bad price.

    By the B337 team. Last updated 8 October 2026.

    The short answer

    • A staking plan is the rule that sets each stake: the same amount every bet, a share of your current bank, enough to win a set amount, or a share sized to your edge with the Kelly criterion.
    • For example, on 100 hypothetical bets with an edge built in by assumption and close to the expected number of winners, five plans finished between +$43 and +$139 from a $1,000 bank.
    • On an unlucky run of 100 hypothetical bets from a $1,000 bank, five staking plans finished between -$487 and -$207, and the plans that staked least at long prices swung least.
    • Expected profit is each stake times its expected value per $1, added up, so when every bet has negative expected value every plan loses on average and only a stake of zero does not.
    • There is no best staking plan for everyone: choose one that suits your prices and your edge, write it down, and never raise stakes to win back a losing run.

    On this page

    1. Four staking plans and the rule behind each
    2. The same 100 bets under each plan
    3. Why staking cannot turn negative EV positive
    4. Choosing a staking plan you will actually follow
    5. Edge cases a staking plan has to cover
    6. Where staking plans go wrong

    Staking plans are rules for how much to bet each time. The four main kinds are level stakes, a percentage of your current bank, staking to win a set amount, and the Kelly criterion. Run on the same 100 hypothetical bets from a $1,000 bank, with Kelly staked in full and at half, they finished between +$43 and +$139 on a record close to its expected winners.

    None of them changes the price you take or the chance of winning, so none can make bets with negative expected value (EV) profitable on average. What a plan decides is how big the swings are, how fast losses shrink the bank, and whether you can keep to it.

    Four staking plans and the rule behind each

    With an illustrative $1,000 bank, a $20 base stake and the three prices used in the comparison below:

    PlanThe ruleStake at $1.85At $3.25At $8.00
    Level stakesThe same amount on every bet$20$20$20
    Percentage of the bankA fixed share of the current bank2% ($20 at the start)2%2%
    Staking to win a set amountStake = target profit / (price - 1)$23.53$8.89$2.86
    Full KellyStake = bank x edge / (price - 1)3.53%2.22%0.86%
    Half KellyHalf the Kelly share1.76%1.11%0.43%

    The Kelly rows use edges of 3% at $1.85, 5% at $3.25 and 6% at $8.00, so the full Kelly share at $1.85 is 0.03 / 0.85 = 3.53%.

    Level stakes

    Level stakes keep records simple: profit / turnover is your yield, and results counted in betting units compare across bank sizes. The stake does not follow the bank, so after a long fall each bet is a bigger share of what is left.

    Percentage of the bank

    Also called proportional staking, this re-sizes every stake from the current bank. Stakes shrink as the bank falls, so a run of losses cannot empty it outright, and they grow as it rises. The cost is compounding: a 2% loss followed by a 2% gain leaves 0.98 x 1.02 = 0.9996 of the bank, a little below where it started.

    Staking to win a set amount

    Each stake is sized so that a winner makes the same profit: $20 to win takes $23.53 at $1.85 but $2.86 at $8.00. That puts the most money on the shortest prices, which steadies results when prices are mixed. It gets heavy at very short prices: to win $20 at $1.10 takes a $200 stake.

    Sizing stakes to your edge

    Kelly sizes each stake from your edge and the price, so a bigger edge or a shorter price means a bigger share. With the same edge on every bet it amounts to staking to win a set share of the current bank, because a Kelly stake x (price - 1) = bank x edge. Every edge is an estimate, so staking a fraction of Kelly is common. The Kelly criterion works through the formula and fractional Kelly the fractions.

    The same 100 bets under each plan

    Example: 100 hypothetical bets from a $1,000 bank, with the edges set by assumption. The true chance at each price is (1 + edge) / price.

    PriceBetsEdgeTrue chanceExpected winnersWinners in the record
    $1.85403%55.7%22.322
    $3.25405%32.3%12.913
    $8.00206%13.25%2.653

    Each plan's result on that record, and on an unlucky and a lucky version of the same 100 bets:

    PlanClose to expected (22, 13 and 3 winners)Unlucky (19, 10 and 1)Lucky (25, 16 and 5)
    Level stakes, $20+$139-$487+$765
    2% of the current bank+$87-$407+$994
    Staking to win $20+$48-$215+$311
    Full Kelly+$61-$384+$829
    Half Kelly+$43-$207+$371

    The working for the first column:

    • Level stakes: 22 x $17 - 18 x $20 + 13 x $45 - 27 x $20 + 3 x $140 - 17 x $20 = $14 + $45 + $80 = $139.
    • Staking to win $20: 22 x $20 - 18 x ($20 / 0.85) + 13 x $20 - 27 x ($20 / 2.25) + 3 x $20 - 17 x ($20 / 7) = $16.47 + $20.00 + $11.43 = $47.90.
    • 2% of the bank: each winner adds 2% x (price - 1) and each of the 62 losers takes 2%, so the bank ends at $1,000 x 1.017 to the power 22 x 1.045 to the power 13 x 1.14 to the power 3 x 0.98 to the power 62 = $1,087.19.
    • Full Kelly: each winner adds exactly its edge to the bank and each loser takes the Kelly share, so the bank ends at $1,000 x 1.03 to the power 22 x 1.05 to the power 13 x 1.06 to the power 3 x (1 - 0.03 / 0.85) to the power 18 x (1 - 0.05 / 2.25) to the power 27 x (1 - 0.06 / 7) to the power 17 = $1,061.29.

    Three things stand out. Level stakes made the most on the middle record, and $80 of its $139 came from the 20 bets at $8.00: 3 x $140 - 17 x $20 = $80. Each $8.00 winner is worth $140 to level stakes and $20 to the to-win plan, so with two of them instead of three, level stakes would have finished at -$21.

    Percentage staking trailed level stakes on the middle record, but it lost less on the unlucky one and made more on the lucky one. Its stakes grow and shrink with the bank, so it bends with the run, and on a record that ends near its start, compounding costs a little.

    Staking to win $20 and half Kelly swung least, from -$215 to +$311 and from -$207 to +$371. They put the least on the $8.00 bets, where one result moves the most money.

    Each plan sets every stake from a fixed amount or a fixed share of the bank, so the order of the results changes the path, not these final figures.

    Risk: Betting involves risk. These bets have an edge built in by assumption; a real edge is an estimate, and a plan that made money on this record can lose on real bets. See responsible gambling for limits and support.

    Why staking cannot turn negative EV positive

    Expected profit = the sum over all bets of stake x expected value per $1. A staking plan only chooses the stakes, so when every bet has negative expected value, every term in that sum is negative and so is the total, whatever the plan.

    Here are the same 100 bets, staked the same ways, with the expected (average) result over every possible outcome. The second column assumes every price is 5% below fair, so each bet's expected value is -5%: true chances of 51.4% at $1.85, 29.2% at $3.25 and 11.9% at $8.00.

    PlanExpected result with the edges assumed aboveExpected result if every bet is -5%
    Level stakes, $20+$88-$100
    2% of the current bank+$92-$95
    Staking to win $20+$49-$68
    Full Kelly on the assumed edges+$102-$116
    Half Kelly on the assumed edges+$50-$60
    Kelly sized on the true edges+$102, the same as full Kelly$0: it places no bets

    The working for level stakes: 100 x $20 x -0.05 = -$100. For 2% of the bank: $1,000 x (1 - 0.02 x 0.05) to the power 100 - $1,000 = -$95.21.

    Every plan's expected result takes the sign of the bets' expected value: a plan only decides how much of it you take on. Full Kelly on edges that are not there loses the most, because it stakes the most. Kelly stakes nothing on a bet it knows has no edge, but it only knows what your estimate tells it.

    Plans that raise stakes after losses, such as the martingale system, are chasing losses written as a rule, and betting systems that don't work tests the others. Price and selection are where a betting strategy finds its edge; staking decides how much of the swing you carry.

    Risk: Betting involves risk. No staking plan changes the price or the chance of winning, and there is no guarantee of profit. See responsible gambling for limits and support.

    Choosing a staking plan you will actually follow

    The best staking plan is the one that suits your prices and your edge, and that you will keep to through a losing run. A plan dropped halfway through a bad stretch protects nothing.

    Your situationA plan that fitsWhy
    No edge estimate for each bet, or a method still being testedSmall level stakesResults read straight as a yield, and the record stays comparable
    Prices mostly between $1.50 and $2.50Level stakes or a percentage of the bankNear $2.00, level stakes and staking to win are almost the same size
    Short prices mixed with long shotsStaking to win a set amount, or fractional KellyBoth put less on long prices, where one result swings the bank most
    An edge estimate for every bet, checked against the closing priceFractional KellyStakes follow the edge, cut back for estimate error
    A losing run tempts you to raise stakesA percentage of the bank, with a written maximum stakeStakes fall with the bank, and the cap is set before the run

    Whatever you choose, write the staking strategy down before the first bet: the bank, the rule, the maximum stake, when you will review it and what ends it, such as the bank running out. Set the bank first, as bankroll management explains, and review after a set number of bets, such as 500, rather than after a bad week.

    Edge cases a staking plan has to cover

    CaseHow to handle it
    A bookmaker accepts only part of your stakeBet what is accepted and record that amount; a limited account is a fact to plan around, never something to route through another person's account
    Each way betsCount the whole outlay against the plan: $20 each way is $40, two bets of $20
    Bonus betsKeep them outside the plan: a bonus bet that loses pays nothing, and the bonus bet converter values one by what it converts to
    Several bets open at oncePercentage and Kelly stakes all come from the same bank, so five open bets at 2% each put 10% of it at risk together
    Stakes that are not round numbersRound down: 2% of $1,087.19 is $21.74, and rounding it up to $25 stakes 2.3% of the bank

    Where staking plans go wrong

    MistakeWhat it costs
    Staking to win at very short pricesTo win $20 at $1.10 takes a $200 stake, so one loser wipes out ten winners
    Switching to a bigger share after a fallMoving from 2% to 5% after the bank drops from $1,000 to $800 lifts the next stake from $16 to $40, double the original $20
    Full Kelly on edges that are not thereOn the 100 bets at -5%, it loses $116 on average against $60 at half Kelly
    Doubling after lossesFrom $20, six losses in a row make the seventh stake $1,280, more than the whole $1,000 bank
    Judging a plan on one recordOn the middle record level stakes made $52 more than 2% of the bank; on the unlucky one they lost $80 more

    Questions

    What is the best staking plan for betting?
    There is not one for everyone: the right plan depends on your prices, how well you know your edge and whether you will keep to it. Staking to win a set amount and fractional Kelly put least on long prices, level stakes keep a record simple, and a percentage of the bank shrinks stakes as the bank falls.
    What is proportional staking?
    It is staking a fixed percentage of your current bank, so stakes grow after wins and shrink after losses. At 2%, a $1,000 bank stakes $20, and the same bank after a fall to $800 stakes $16.
    Is level staking better than percentage staking?
    Neither wins on every record. On the 100 hypothetical bets, level stakes made more on the record close to expectation ($139 against $87), while percentage staking lost less on the unlucky record ($407 against $487) and made more on the lucky one ($994 against $765).
    Can a staking plan beat the bookmaker's margin?
    No. A staking plan changes how much rides on each bet, not the price or the chance of winning, so on bets with negative expected value every plan loses on average and the plans that stake more lose more.
    What is fixed-return staking?
    It is staking so that every winner returns the same total, stake included: stake = target return / price. It differs from staking to win a set amount, which leaves the stake out, so returning $50 at $1.50 takes a $33.33 stake while winning $50 takes $100.

    Related

    • Betting strategy that holds up: price, staking, testing and records
    • Betting bankroll management: set a bank and size every bet from it
    • Kelly criterion betting: the stake formula and why to use a fraction
    • What a unit in betting is, how to size one and how to read unit records
    • The martingale betting system and why doubling up after a loss fails
    • Strike rate betting and the break-even strike rate at each price
    • How to track betting results and read them honestly
    • Value betting explained: edge, expected value and why value bets lose
    • Why betting odds change and what each move tells you

    Betting involves risk. Bookmakers can restrict or close accounts and void bets, automation can fail, prices move, and a positive expected value (+EV) bet can still lose. Promotions carry each bookmaker's own terms. There is no guarantee of profit. 18+ only. For free and confidential support call 1800 858 858 or visit gamblinghelponline.org.au. See responsible gambling for limits and support.

    Products

    • Terminal
    • Execution API
    • Full Automation

    Guides and tools

    • All guides
    • Betting glossary
    • Betting calculators
    • How betting bots work
    • Arbitrage betting
    • Middle betting
    • Matched betting
    • Betting exchanges
    • Odds types explained
    • Horse racing software
    • Money back racing promos
    • Bonus bet converter
    • Terminal pricing
    • Execution pricing
    • How tokens work

    Company

    • About
    • Security
    • Responsible gambling
    • Contact
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    What are you really gambling with?

    18+ only. For free and confidential support call 1800 858 858 or visit gamblinghelponline.org.au. Self-exclusion: BetStop (betstop.gov.au).

    B337 is software, not a bookmaker or wagering service provider. Bets are placed in accounts you hold with Australian bookmakers. Bookmaker names are trade marks of their owners; B337 is not affiliated with or endorsed by them. Bookmaker terms may restrict automated betting.

    Bet337 © 2026Join our Discord